The Emu War: When the Australian Army Took on Flightless Birds—and Lost

Australia - Ekhbary News Agency

The Great Emu War: When Australia Declared War on Birds and the Birds Won

In the annals of military history, few campaigns are as peculiar, or as ultimately unsuccessful, as the "Emu War" fought in Western Australia in November 1932. Faced with an unprecedented crisis—thousands of large, flightless birds systematically destroying vital wheat crops—the Australian government authorized a military operation. The enemy? Emus. The outcome? A resounding, albeit comical, victory for the avian adversaries and a stark lesson for human intervention in nature.

The roots of this peculiar conflict trace back to the aftermath of World War I. Australia, like many nations, grappled with reintegrating a vast number of returning soldiers. A government initiative, "soldier settlement," aimed to provide ex-servicemen with land, particularly in Western Australia, to cultivate wheat. This policy, intended to reward veterans and boost agricultural output, inadvertently sowed the seeds for future conflict. By the late 1920s and early 1930s, the global Great Depression had sent wheat prices plummeting, and the government's promised subsidies for struggling farmers were withdrawn. This economic hardship left many soldier-settlers on the brink of ruin.

Compounding the agricultural and economic woes was an ecological shift. Emus, native to Australia, undertake seasonal migrations. In the late 1920s and early 1930s, their migratory routes increasingly intersected with the newly established farmlands. The emus discovered a readily available buffet: wheat crops provided ample food and water, and the cleared land offered easier passage. They descended in droves, trampling crops, destroying fences, and turning fertile fields into wastelands. For the already desperate farmers, this was the final insult. They appealed to the government for help, demanding action against the "feathered pests."

The government's response was to deploy the military. Not a large contingent, but a small, specialized force: three soldiers armed with two Lewis machine guns and 10,000 rounds of .303 ammunition. The mission was clear: cull the emu population and protect the crops. Major Gwynydd Purves Wynne-Aubrey Meredith was placed in command of this unusual "Emu War" contingent.

The initial encounters proved disastrously ineffective. The emus, far from being easy targets, proved remarkably resilient and elusive. Their speed, agility, and sheer numbers overwhelmed the soldiers' tactics. One account details how the birds, when fired upon, would scatter in all directions, making coordinated targeting impossible. The machine guns, designed for trench warfare, were ill-suited for pursuing fast-moving, unpredictable ground targets across vast, open terrain. Attempts to mount a gun on a moving vehicle were hampered by the poor quality of the roads, making accurate firing impossible.

After a week of frustrating skirmishes, the military operation was temporarily halted. Major Meredith reported a low kill count relative to the ammunition expended, estimating perhaps a few hundred birds killed. He described the emus as possessing an almost "tank-like" ability to withstand bullets and move with uncanny resilience, even resorting to racist comparisons to describe their perceived tenacity. Undeterred, the operation resumed a week later.

The second phase of the Emu War lasted for about a month. Official reports, albeit disputed, claimed a higher number of emus killed—around 986, with an additional 2,500 believed to have died from injuries. However, the ammunition expenditure remained disproportionately high. Critics and historians, notably Murray Johnson in a 2006 paper, pointed out the logistical and statistical absurdity of the claims. It was questioned how such precise kill counts could be obtained, and whether the machine-gun fire might have actually exacerbated crop damage by causing the birds to panic and trample more fields.

The operation was ultimately deemed a failure. The military withdrew, having failed to achieve its objective of controlling the emu population. The Emu War became a source of national embarrassment and widespread ridicule. Many suspected the deployment was partly a publicity stunt, especially given the presence of a cinematographer to document the "war." The footage, when released, was seen as more farcical than heroic, with some noting its similarity to the comedic timing of Monty Python.

The long-term solution to the emu problem was not military might, but engineering. Decades later, after numerous failed attempts at culling and bounty programs, the Western Australian government invested heavily in constructing a vast network of fences. This barrier, initially 135 miles long and eventually expanded to nearly 850 miles, effectively corralled the emus, protecting agricultural areas. However, this solution also came with its own environmental consequences, disrupting native wildlife habitats and migration corridors. The Emu War remains a curious footnote in history, a testament to the unpredictable challenges of managing human-wildlife conflict and a reminder that sometimes, nature has the upper hand.

Ekhbary News Agency